02 Screening & due diligence
Fraud & Corporate Integrity Screening
Integrity failures rarely sit in a single record. They sit in the pattern across several — which is precisely what automated screening cannot see.
Start a pilotA compliance platform checks a name against lists. It does not notice that the counterparty’s finance director previously held office at two dissolved companies with the same registered agent, or that a supposedly arm’s-length supplier shares a correspondence address with a board member’s spouse.
We screen for those patterns: prior allegations, regulatory enforcement, disqualifications, related-party dealing and undisclosed conflicts. Then we set out the pattern rather than the fragments, and we are explicit about where a finding is suggestive rather than conclusive.
01 What you receive
Deliverables.
Every engagement produces a written, sourced deliverable — not a dashboard login you will never open.
- Integrity screening report
- Findings across fraud indicators, enforcement, disqualification and conflicts.
- Relationship mapping
- Connections between individuals, entities and addresses that the records reveal.
- Assessment
- A stated view on what the pattern suggests, and how confident we are in it.
- Source file
- The underlying records, so your own advisers can test the reasoning.
02 Method
How it runs.
- 01
Scope
The subject set is agreed — often wider than the named counterparty alone.
- 02
Screen
Enforcement, insolvency, disqualification, litigation and adverse media across relevant jurisdictions.
- 03
Connect
Records are cross-referenced for shared officers, addresses, agents and control.
- 04
Assess
We report the pattern with an explicit confidence level attached to each judgement.
04 Common questions
Is this the same as due diligence?
It overlaps. Due diligence answers "who is this and what is their record". Integrity screening asks the narrower question of whether there are indicators of dishonesty, conflict or concealment — often on a subject who has already passed a standard check.
What if a finding is only suggestive?
We say so. Every judgement carries an explicit confidence level. Presenting a suspicion as a conclusion would expose you to more risk than the original counterparty, so we do not do it.
Can you screen an existing supplier rather than a new one?
Yes, and it is frequently more valuable. Relationships that predate a formal onboarding process are often the least examined and the longest running.
Tell us what you would want watched. We will scope a pilot on it, in writing, before anything is agreed.